Quake lifts Solomons island out of the sea

BoomerD

Well-Known Member
Quake lifts Solomons island out of the sea - Yahoo! News

RANONGGA, Solomon Islands (AFP) - The seismic jolt that unleashed the deadly Solomons tsunami this week lifted an entire island metres out of the sea, destroying some of the world's most pristine coral reefs.

In an instant, the grinding of the Earth's tectonic plates in the 8.0 magnitude earthquake Monday forced the island of Ranongga up three metres (10 foot).

Submerged reefs that once attracted scuba divers from around the globe lie exposed and dying after the quake raised the mountainous landmass, which is 32-kilometres (20-miles) long and 8-kilometres (5-miles) wide.

Corals that used to form an underwater wonderland of iridescent blues, greens and reds now bleach under the sun, transforming into a barren moonscape surrounding the island.

The stench of rotting fish and other marine life stranded on the reefs when the seas receded is overwhelming and the once vibrant coral is dry and crunches underfoot.

Dazed villagers stand on the shoreline, still coming to terms with the cataclysmic shift that changed the geography of their island forever, pushing the shoreline out to sea by up to 70 metres.

Aid agencies have yet to reach Ranongga after the quake and tsunami that killed at least 34 people in the Pacific archipelago but an AFP reporter and photographer on a chartered boat witnessed the destruction first hand.

At Pienuna, on Ranongga's east coast, locals said much of their harbour had disappeared, leaving only a narrow inlet lined by jagged exposed coral reefs either side.

Villager Harison Gago said there were huge earthquake fissures which had almost split the island in half, gesturing with his hands that some of the cracks were 50 centimetres (20 inches) wide.

Further north at Niu Barae, fisherman Hendrik Kegala had just finished exploring the new underwater landscape of the island with a snorkel when contacted by the AFP team.

He said a huge submerged chasm had opened up, running at least 500 metres (550 yards) parallel to the coast.

On the beach at Niu Barae, the earthquake has revealed a sunken vessel that locals believe is a Japanese patrol boat, a remnant of the fierce fighting between Allied forces and the Japanese in WWII.

Kegala said that from the perspective of those on the island, the sea appeared to recede and villagers still feared it would come back again as a tsunami, making them reluctant to return from higher ground where they fled.

"Plenty big noise," he told AFP, describing the disaster in the local pidgin dialect.

"Water go back and not come back again," he added, saying the whooshing sound of the receding water and the shaking from the quake occurred simultaneously.

Danny Kennedy, a dive operator in the provincial capital Gizo, said the earthquake had damaged coral reefs throughout the Solomon Islands' western province.

He said dive sites once ranked among the best in the world were dying because the tremors had upset the fragile natural ecosystem.

"Some of the most beautiful corals are the most delicate and those are the ones that have been affected," he told AFP.

"The more robust corals are still there but it's the ones that people want to photograph, the sea fans and the colourful corals, that are dying."

Kennedy said the damage to the coral reefs could dry up the region's major source of overseas money.

"Diving is huge here, it employs so many local people," he said. "The fear is that people are going to come here and see the reefs are damaged then tell people not to come back for a few years until they recover."

Jackie Thomas, acting manager for Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF) in the Solomons, said the loss of the reefs was a huge blow for the fishing communities that are dotted along Ranongga's coast.

"The fish from the reefs are the major source of protein for the villagers," she told AFP from Gizo.

"They use shells for tools and rely on the sea for many of their basic needs.

"It just shows the incredible force of the earthquake, to move a whole island."

She said the reefs around Ranongga were a protected marine environment and locals had worked hard with WWF in recent years to ensure that they were managed sustainably.

"Now it's another marine environment that has been destroyed," she said.

"Who knows if the coral reefs will recover and the fish will come back? Villagers will have to travel further to find the same sort of food and nutrition they've relied on -- the whole food chain has been disrupted."



What a terrible loss. Not only what the people on the islands suffered, but the loss of what is described as a "pristine reef" just adds to the tragedy of this. Hopefully, the reef will recover over the next few years. For a change, the loss of a major coral reef isn't the fault of us humans...
 

mps9506

Well-Known Member
Very interesting story. It will make a great case study over the decades to see how the islands ecosystem recovers over the next century or so. Hopefully it will be allowed to recover naturally without to much interference from man.
 

Pro_builder

Well-Known Member
This is a real tragic event, I just wish that we could have done something to be able to prevent or save the corals and fish. :tears: :crown:
 

lcstorc

Well-Known Member
I just read a story about their reefs and how they were aquaculturing corals for export. This is horrible for them and anyone who loves the reefs like we do.
 

Dentoid

Smile Maker
PREMIUM
Wow! That's amazing. Mother Nature is an awesome force and so is thermodynamics. At some point there will be no more natural thermal energy to convert to mechanical work and this planet will cease to exist as we know it! In the mean time it's going to give us a thrill!
 

billyr98

Well-Known Member
Very sad story but its out of our hands... That is why I love the fact of aquaculturing corals from hobbyist!
 

mps9506

Well-Known Member
Very sad story but its out of our hands... That is why I love the fact of aquaculturing corals from hobbyist!

Yup. We need to minimize our impact on the reefs and environment in general. It's great to see places start culturing corals as opposed to chopping up reef heads.
 

Triggerjay

Well-Known Member
Something I do not understand.. Aquaculturing... If a given piece of coral was taken form the ocean, and aquacultured, you have the possiblilty of getting multiple frags from it, and end up with lots of coral. But it was removed form the ocean anyways. If the same sample was left in the ocean, wouldnt it have grown anyways, and produced just as much coral for the hobbyist and the reef it grows on? and been better off left in its natural enviornment? I know it seems like a better option, being it is so called "tank raised", but is it really? It is still from the ocean, but now you have human intervention in its growth, which could lead to error a lot easier than leaving it in the ocean, and letting nature take its course, and harvesting only part of the coral, and not the whole thing, so it could reproduce naturally? I am not trying to take one side or the other, just cant understand where it would benefit the coral one way or another? Its still from the ocean..A little light on the subject would be appreciated.... Thanks

Jason
 

BigAl07

Administrator
RS STAFF
One knowledgeable careful person goes TO the reef and gets a specimen... takes it back and cultures it... spreads the new cultures around and around and around.... ......

the alternative is for EVERYONE to go into the ocean and hap-haphazardly chop and stomp and destroy the entire reef trying to get that one specimen.

Allen :)
 

Triggerjay

Well-Known Member
so basically, it is to keep people out of the reefs? I thought permits had to be obtained to harvest corals for trade? If that were the case, you would think the person/people harvesting the corals, would be careful about it, not only to preserve the reef, but to ensure future profits? I do see now however, how keeping more people out of the reefs would help to preserve them. If I saw a coral in a reef, that I wanted in my tank, and it was the only one, I would say I would be hard pressed not to take it... so on that note, I see where aquaculture has its benefits..

Jason
 

lcstorc

Well-Known Member
I believe that by aquaculturing they can get more of the same coral faster. The article I just read was telling how they take just a small piece of the mother coral and then frag that into multiple corals. These they grow out in a controled environment specifically set up for maximum growth. So by taking one part of the wild coral they get many frags and frags of frags etc on down the line. Meanwhile the mother coral is still in the reef and quickly re-grows the part that was removed. So basically they force more growth than would naturally occur by controling the environment the frags are raised in. Also since the frags of the frags have always been in the controlled environment they tend to do better in the controlled envoronment of our reefs. So if you get a nice healthy coral that grows in your reef you will not be out buying another coral to replace the one that died or failed to grow to your expectations.
 

Triggerjay

Well-Known Member
we must have been on the same page... I just read that too. I was afraid to mention the subject, without upsetting people. I'm glad I didn't. I was trying to find out why so many people say that aquacultured corals are better, and now I know. Thanks all

Jason
 

kyrie_eleison

Has been struck by the ban stick
sad. Very sad. Not only for the corals and fish but to the people. Thousands of years of creation destroyed in less than an hour. *sigh*
 

lcstorc

Well-Known Member
At least for once it wasn't us directly destroying things but an act of nature. Somehow that makes it a bit easier to handle. It is even worse IMO when people destroy for no reason.
 
Top